Does Richard Spencer Support ‘Free Speech’ in Russia?


By Brandon Martinez

Richard Spencer recently held a “free speech” rally to protest the violence of American leftists against right-wingers. He was himself sucker punched in the face by an Antifa terrorist. Spencer and others in the Alt-Right proclaim that they believe in an unfettered “freedom of speech.” But are they consistent?

When it comes to the sacred cow of Putin’s Russia, cucked rightists like Spencer say nothing about the dismal state of free speech in that country, which boasts laws that punish virtually anyone who disagrees with the Russian government on anything. Russia has “hate speech” laws in the form of “extremism” legislation that punishes expressions of ethnic separatism, nationalism, xenophobia, etc., but only for non-Russian ethnics that seek to secede from the Russian Federation. The law has been used against critics of the regime, including relatives of victims of the Beslan massacre for implying Putin was complicit in their relatives’ deaths. In 2014 Putin passed a Holocaust denial law banning opinions on the Second World War that contradict the official Russian/Allied version. Russian punk rock artists were jailed for doing an impromptu protest show in a church. Bloggers have been arrested. Russians have been flung in prison for years simply for reposting memes critical of the Russian state on social media. A Ukrainian library was shut down and its owner arrested for publishing Ukrainian literature deemed “Russophobic.” The Kremlin is even trying to ban Jehovah’s Witnesses as an extremist group. Dozens of opponents and critics of Putin have been murdered in contract killings that have all the hallmarks of KGB targeted assassinations. Media outlets have been shut down, sued and stifled for printing criticism of the Putin regime. Putin has put in place draconian internet censorship laws resembling the great blockade on information implemented by the Chinese communist dictatorship. Protests in Russia are routinely barred and oppositionists thrown in jail on trumped up charges. Even a mock protest with dolls holding signs was shut down by the Russian authorities! Not even 10-year-olds are immune from being arrested for public demonstrations.

And yet you hear nothing about this from the “free speech” warriors of the Alt-Right, many of whom praise Russia and Putin simply because he’s less “liberal” on social issues than some Western states. Spencer in particular is a rabid cuck for Russia. He’s married to a Russian woman who is a strident propagandist for the Kremlin and translates into English the works of Alexander Dugin, the Eurasianist hack who wants Russia to conquer Eastern Europe. Spencer even voiced opposition to commemorating or depicting in film the great Ukrainian famine, the Holodomor, because it makes Russia look bad.

This absurd love-in with Russia and its totalitarian state among some on the Alt-Right must be criticized. They can’t, on the one hand, pay lip service to “free speech” in America where it affects them, but then support a tyrant in Russia who does everything in his power to crush it.

Former Anti-Islam Activist Wants Me to Stop Criticizing Muslims

Is Jaci Stanton a hooker for the Palestinian resistance?

By Brandon Martinez

The other day I responded to the non-arguments of a woman named Jaci Stanton. She’s a former liberal atheist anti-Islam activist who bizarrely wants me to stop criticizing Muslims and being a “racist” nationalist calling for an end to the white genocide occurring in Europe. She’s still blabbing away like there’s no tomorrow.

I recall a few years back Stanton had a YouTube channel of a liberal atheist bent. It’s gone now, but from what I remember more than 50 percent of her content was anti–Islam material. She would post videos of Muslims stoning people to death and savagely chopping off the hands of accused thieves. She asserted that Islam was a backwards, violent religion hell-bent on world domination. I remember she even said Muslim immigration was an Islamic weapon of conquest through a process called “hijrah“. Yet now she’s criticizing me for opposing this invasion.

Apparently she’s completely changed her mind on Muslims, and now speaks of them with excessive (and downright creepy) fealty, describing them as “kind and loving” who have a “gentleness and sweetness” about them. In this recent article she expressed a sexual desire for these brutish bearded Arabs and Muslims, calling them “sweet hot guys” and that she thinks “a lot of Arab guys are hot.” She literally has a sexual fetish for Arab and Muslim men! She says she has befriended a lot of Arabs and Muslims online which explains why she’s trying to seduce them on Facebook by posing like a prostitute for a hooker catalog with Palestinian imagery in the backdrop. Maybe she wants to be a sex slave for Hamas, who knows. Perhaps she’s already a sex slave for the Islamic State, chained down in one of their dungeons being forced to say nice things about Islam and Muslims online. Kidding aside, she’s a total weirdo.

She’s criticizing my more strident tone on Islam/Muslims these days as they ransack Europe on the orders of George Soros, complaining that this contrasts with my previous rhetoric from years ago which was more along the lines of setting up an alliance with this group. But this is the same woman who previously declared Islam the most dangerous faith on earth and focused most of her time attacking it. If she wants to see what a volte-face looks like, then she should have a look in the mirror.

She has no argument against what I’m saying now other than to deny the growing insanity of the “truther” cult who, for the most part, claim virtually all Muslim terrorism is manufactured. Other than that she’s a liberal who constantly throws around the “racist” charge at nationalist critics of mass immigration and the Zionist Kalergi plan to destroy the West.

I critique Muslims and Islam from a European nationalist perspective, not a liberal atheist one. You don’t see me whining about gay and women’s rights in Muslim countries. I highlight what Muslims and other parasitic migrants are doing in our countries in the West. My argument is that Muslims are cultural imperialists who seek to supplant “infidel” cultures that don’t conform to their 7th century primitive religious doctrines. If they could, they would tear down and ransack every church in Europe. And when they become populous and politically strong enough, they probably will. I don’t really care what barbarism these people wish to engage in within their own countries. But I don’t want that in Europe. But I don’t limit that to Muslim immigrants. Obviously all non-white immigration is problematic and part of the plan to degrade Europe.

The problem is this woman is a single mom with too much time on her hands. She should be focused on things females typically do and are good at like cooking, housekeeping and raising children. Entering complex political discussions is the last thing a woman should do. This woman proves it.

Black Supremacist Thug Ice Cube on ‘White Privilege’

By Brandon Martinez

This is pathetic. Ice Cube, a gangster rapper who used to rap about killing cops and “white devils,” is lecturing Bill Maher about “white privilege” and racism for using the n-word in a joke. Cube says that only black people can use the n-word, which they employ as often as prepositions, especially in the gangsta rap genre. This speech policing is insane. Privileged blacks like Ice Cube can be as anti-white as they please (calling whites ‘crackers’ and ‘devils’) and yet they catch absolutely no flack for it. In fact, the more anti-white they are the more opportunities they seem to get. And yet he claims America is today run by evil white racists who oppress blacks? If that were true he wouldn’t be a multimillionaire for rapping about killing white people and cops. The only reason Cube has been successful is because he’s black. He has black privilege. He’s a terrible actor and his rap is sub-par. But the leftist establishment elevates people like him to positions of influence deliberately as an attack on white people.

IslamoCuck Truther Girl Can’t Muster an Argument

By Brandon Martinez

The “truthers” have no serious arguments against what I’ve said in various articles critiquing them on this blog. Case in point is this piece about me by some Islamocuck truther girl named Jaci Stanton.

The entire article is bereft of any actual attempt at refuting what I say in my articles on truthers and their contradictions. Instead, she wrote a long autobiographical screed about how she became so favourable to Muslims after learning “the truth” about 9/11 and neocon-inspired wars. Throughout the piece she mentions that after discovering war crimes committed by the US in Iraq, she developed a “huge passion for” the Middle East and Muslims. Yeah, I would say that’s the standard backstory and psychology of most Islamophilic truthers. Nothing special here.

She writes that, “I did not ever draw conclusions about Daesh or become a voice against Zionists and Israel because I wanted to think of Muslims a certain way.” But that’s not true. She attested to developing a philo-Islamic view after being exposed to information about crimes committed against Muslims in various Middle Eastern wars. So all of her views about Muslims after that point have obviously been tainted with the proclivity to see them as eternal victims who can do no wrong on their own accord. That’s the problem. That bias has caused her analysis of Muslim issues generally to be skewed by feelings of guilt and sympathy that arose from reading about the suffering of some Middle Easterners during the wars after 9/11. I don’t deny that some Muslims have been victims of injustice. My bias against Islam and Muslim immigration into the West doesn’t stop me from acknowledging that in certain cases they have been wronged by non-Muslims (Iraq war, Palestine, etc.). But that doesn’t mean all or even the majority of Muslims are therefore victims, nor does it mean that Islam is a benevolent religion. Nor does that disprove the fact that some Muslims have been perpetrators and aggressors, rather than victims, both today and historically.

She and others like her refuse to address my valid points, such as that the Islamic terror threat today is clearly real, thus rendering 9/11 truth a pointless exercise in that it’s main contention, that the “terror threat” is fabricated, is now an untenable position to maintain. How about that 9/11 can’t be used as a pretext for future wars, thus rendering 9/11 irrelevant from an anti-war perspective? Or the fact that the “truthers” can’t get their story straight in that they say Islamic terror is fake “over here” but that it’s real “over there” in the Middle East. None of these issues are addressed.

What it comes down to, and what she essentially confesses to, is that she was upset over the Iraq war so she became a bleeding heart shill for Muslims in all their struggles. When Muslims do wrong, it’s not them doing it, but shadowed CIA agents forcing their hand. But that’s not actually proving what they think it is. If Muslim radicals are working with the CIA, then all it proves is that radical Muslims are willing to sacrifice principles to collaborate with other evildoers for short term gain when they have a common interest with these other players. That would make them doubly evil, not innocent. So the claim here is basically that radical Muslims are the murderous foot soldiers for the big powers. I guess that means we should hate them even more?

This woman is engaged in typical reactionary politics and leftists are famous for it. They find out who has been “victimized” in some form or fashion and then leap to their defence in every situation. It’s the same dynamic when leftists write apologia for third world dictatorships like North Korea. Kim Jung-Un is being “targeted” by the big bad American empire so he “must be doing something good.”

She writes that she “loves Muslims” and describes them as “kind and loving” who have “a gentleness and sweetness about them.” Yeah, tell that to the people who have had their heads sawed off by Isis, were just knifed to death on the London Bridge or were run over by a Muslim kamikaze in a truck. Tell that to the 2,000 Nigerians massacred in a matter of days by the “kind and loving” Islamists of Boko Haram who are just doing Allah’s work. This kind of pro-Islamic cuckoldry is a sign of our times as the left tries to drive the dagger deeper into the heart of the West.

While she lacks any serious argument refuting my points, she does manage to mete out some insults about my eyes scaring her, how I’m a “douche bag,” and the typical leftist charge that I’m a “racist.” Then there’s this gem in the comments:

But, yeah, this Brandon Martinez guy has revealed himself as some sort of arrogant psycho with disturbed eyes. To me as a woman he looks like the kind of guy who would slip rufies in my drink and laugh at me if I fell. He’s messed up.

Oh, how typical of an emotional woman to make up outrageous nonsense in order to impute malevolent intentions on someone she disagrees with. This rhetoric reminds me of what unstable women typically do when they go through a break-up with a guy: portray their exes as evil SOBs who are intent on hurting and raping women. Not only am I an evil racist, but “clearly” I’m the kind of guy who would try to abuse women! Racist, sexist, misogynistic, homophobic, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic – these are all the evils that the left attribute to straight, white men. This is all so ironic considering she’s an Islamophile who has a love-in with a genuine rape culture. In Islam, when a woman is raped, she is the one charged with adultery! But she just loves herself some Muslims whereas an evil white male like myself is the real danger.

These paranoid truthers label all dissent from their cult narrative as “cognitive infiltration” by the shadow government to throw them off their fruitless quest for truth and justice. They function like a standard cult on par with scientology. Dissenters and critics are scorned and abused. The party line must be enforced at all times. Anyone who sways is a “heretic” to be outcast forever.

Also of note is that on her Facebook page, she’s posing like a prostitute in front of leftie pro-Palestine memes. What would her pious Muslim friends think of that?

She claims she’s not virtue-signalling for Muslims yet in the article she posted this weird picture of a smiling Muslim guy. Clearly an attempt to portray Muslims as harmless fuzzy teddy bears that just want a big hug. That is the very definition of virtue signalling!

Leftist Hack Oliver Stone Loves Putin

By Brandon Martinez

Oliver Stone is a vanilla leftie who loves any foreign dictator that “stands up” in some form or fashion to the US. So it’s no surprise that he just did a series of fawning interviews with Putin, which will be released as a documentary. In an interview with Stephen Colbert, Stone doubled down on his admiration for the Russian tyrant.

Stone previously made documentaries glorifying Marxist Latin American leaders like Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and Evo Morales of Bolivia. Stone does the leftist standard circuit of licking the backsides of any government leader, no matter how oppressive, that isn’t cooperating with the US on some front.

Colbert pressed Stone on Putin’s oppressive authoritarian system which has trampled on free speech, jailed and harassed political opponents, and assassinated the most strident critics of the regime. Stone’s lame response was that he “supports free speech” but refused to condemn Putin for constructing an Orwellian police state in Russia where even social media posts critical of the Kremlin can land you in jail for years. Stone then grumbled about how Putin was a poor victim of unfair “abuse” by the media.

Stone’s son Sean is a conspiratard who believes in every imaginable conspiracy theory and has a show on Russia Today called “The Hawks.” They’re both afflicted with a leftist myopia that sees no other evil in the world besides that of the US government/establishment. All other oligarchies/establishments, like those in Russia, China, Iran, etc., are lionized as “victims” of “the empire.” Only the US and its allies are deemed  “bad,” whereas the rest of the world are innocent doves who just want to sing kumbaya with their neighbours. This one-track thinking is the basis of all leftist “anti-imperialist” presumptions and the reason leftists are such slimy apologists for any backwards tyranny outside the Western hemisphere.

Some rightists also have a love-in with Putin on the sole basis that Russia is “less liberal” on social issues than Western states at the present time. If that’s the only criteria, then why don’t these pro-Putin rightists pack up and move to Russia and embrace the “White man’s paradise”? They won’t do that because they know their standard of living would significantly decrease once they enter the Putinist Utopia.

Diversity in London Brings Terror

By Brandon Martinez

Another day, another terror attack in Europe. Soon enough this will be a daily occurrence.

Muslim radicals seem to have a thing for vans, trucks and knives, don’t they?

Some radical Muslim killers just ran down and knifed a bunch of innocent people in London while shouting the usual Muslim slogans. Seven are confirmed dead, and close to 50 are wounded.

This comes on the tail end of the monstrous Manchester stadium bombing where an Isis devotee blew himself up, killing mostly teenage girls.

As London’s globalist Muslim mayor said last year, terrorist attacks are just “part and parcel” of living in a major city… perhaps in cities where his co-religionists are a sizeable minority, like London.

I always find it confounding that “truthers” instantly play the false flag card for an attack that happens in the West, but never do so for attacks that happen elsewhere.

In the past few weeks there have been multiple attacks by Islamist militants in the Middle East. In late May there was a vicious assault in Egypt targeting a bus full of Coptic Christians. A bombing near the Afghan presidential palace took place in Afghanistan around the same time. Back in April there were two separate bombings against Christian churches in Egypt. All the attacks were claimed by Isis or affiliated groups. An Isis affiliate recently invaded the city of Marawi in southern Philippines, killing hundreds.

How can all of that be a grand “false flag”?

The biased “truthers” never apply their hardened skepticism to events that occur outside the West. Actually, they usually just ignore anything that can’t be pinned on a Western regime. That’s because their propaganda is designed exclusively to discredit and demonize “the West.” Violence in non-Western countries is ignored, downplayed or somehow pinned on the West, too. These are not researchers, they’re basement-dwelling dolts with a nihilistic agenda to tear down Western civilization.

Some of them, like Kevin Barrett, vigorously support the migrant invasion of Europe and strive for an Islamic Caliphate that they hope will one day beat down and humiliate the Kaffir West. Islamists like Barrett have some lunatic leftist allies in Europe who want the same thing:

The van/knife attack in London is standard MO for radical Muslims in Europe who have launched similar attacks in France, Sweden, etc. If these are “false flags,” it only serves to benefit the nationalist opposition challenging the liberal elite currently in power across Europe. So if the pro-open borders liberal elite in power were constantly staging false flags, it’s much more likely they’d frame-up right-wing nationalists to discredit their principle opposition. Why would they constantly stage false flags and blame Muslims or migrants when they’re the ones who let these malcontents in? This would only serve to disgrace the current rulers and empower the nationalists.

None of that matters to the “truthers” who are pushing a narrow pro-Muslim, leftist agenda. The liberal truther narrative must maintain that all violence by Muslims is fake or, if real, was the result of a sinister CIA mind control program. Because Muslims would never commit violence on their own volition unless under mind control by evil white CIA agents in black suits, right?

But who cares. Such people are insignificant and exist mainly as fringe trolls in the social media sphere, retweeting each other’s nonsense.

The only way to stop terrorism in Europe is to elect nationalist leaders to power who will secure the borders and deport the radicals immediately. Muslim and migrant terrorism should be used to discredit the leftist elite ruining Europe. They, along with their migrant pawns, have European blood on their hands. The blood will keep flowing so long as they stay in power. They let it happen by welcoming in savages who have no respect for the cultures they’re squatting in, and who have allegiances to foreign countries and groups with primitive Abrahamic values.

In response to the latest outrage, British PM Theresa May said, ‘enough is enough.’ But her words are meaningless if she won’t actually do what needs to be done. May is not a nationalist, but a globalist hack working in lock-step with the Sorosian-Kalergiite Zionist elite who want to kill and bury Western civilization, permanently.

Watson’s Vid On the Spiralling Migrant Crisis

By Brandon Martinez

Paul J. Watson’s new video exposes how people smugglers operating off the coast of Libya are literally running a taxi-service for migrants, ferrying boat-loads of Africans across the Med with the help of George Soros-funded NGOs and aid agencies.

Soros’ sprawling network of NGOs and aid agencies are working in tandem with the criminal human traffickers, communicating directly with them and helping “rescue” the smugglers’ human cargo off the coast of Italy. The agencies then let the Africans loose into Italy where they’re now taking over southern cities and turning them into crime hubs. Far from being poor, destitute refugees fleeing war-zones, these migrants cough up 1500 euros to get a seat on one of the traffickers’ boats. Other videos have shown migrants loitering around Europe wearing decent clothing and carrying expensive smartphones. They are not in desperate need of aid and assistance. Rather, they’re selfishly country-shopping throughout Europe looking to score the best welfare deal.

Watson cucks out in the video around the 7:30 mark, where he denounces racism, xenophobia and declares the anti-migrant activism of the growing identitarian movement “futile vigilantism.” He goes on to say the issue is not one of race but solely “culture.” This is the standard position of alt-light kosher conservatives. They can’t bring themselves to acknowledge the importance of two thorny issues that they know will bring heat down on them: race realism and the Jewish question.

True to form, Watson avoids both like the plague. He’s put out triggered attack videos on the alt-right alongside SuperCuck Mike Cernovich, wherein together they railed against the alt-right calling them right-wing social justice warriors. This is the Milo Yiannopoulos line. The self-styled “dangerous faggot” also wants to discredit white identitarianism and nationalism by comparing it with Black Lives Matter and other non-white identity groups pushing their ethnic agendas. Meanwhile, the hypocrite has ardently expressed good wishes and support for Israel, a Jewish ethno-state based on the identity politics of Zionism.

The modus operandi of Watson and the alt-light in general is to frame the discussion as an issue of “culture” and “Western values,” which supposedly anybody can adopt through assimilation. But that ignores a whole host of genetic and cultural factors that inhibit certain groups from integrating. And the issue is not merely culture or values, but the ethnic replacement of whites through mass immigration. The culture of the West cannot possibly be preserved if the genetics of the people who created the values and ideas underpinning that culture is severally altered or erased. Africans couldn’t re-create Europe or maintain its high standards – even if they were given a blueprint on how to do so – simply by sharing some cultural attributes with the indigenous whites of the continent, like a London accent or European manner of dress.

Paramount to the alt-light agenda is ignoring, downplaying and otherwise belittling discussions of Jewish power and its role in the Cultural Marxist mission. Loyal to their paymasters, alt-light gurus dutifully steer discussions away from the evidence of elite Jewish involvement in opening the floodgates of immigration in the West, a policy tailored to suit their own tribal interests as a “minority” trying to dominate a majority. Instead, the alt-light focalize attacks squarely on Islam and “the left.” The only Jew they’re willing to go after is George Soros, but they make sure to obscure his Jewish messianic motives and purposefully fail to connect him to the broader Jewish-Zionist establishment who back the same destructive policies contributing to our demise.

Whites Are the Global Minority

Commentary by Brandon Martinez

Lana Lokteff poses an interesting question in her latest video: why would anyone actually want to be a minority? You’ll often see minorities in the West complaining that they’re “not being treated fairly”; not being given “equal rights” or opportunities. Yet why then did they choose to leave their own country where they were most likely part of the majority? Why deliberately put themselves at a disadvantage as a minority?

The reason is that the living conditions in whatever country they came from was obviously so bad that being a minority in a Western country is better than being part of the majority there. Additionally, they know that minorities in the West are not treated badly, but are propped up on a pedestal by the liberal-leftist establishment. They’re handed all kinds of free stuff until they can “get on their feet” in our societies.

This minority whining game is a shaming tactic to guilt whites into relinquishing resources to support the “poor, helpless” minorities in their midst. Minorities are very good at this game. Shaming works like a charm on bleeding-heart liberals, leftists and cucks. But it doesn’t work on strong, nationalist men and women who see through the charade.

Lokteff makes the case that whites are by far a global minority. So while black, brown and Asian people may be “minorities” in Western countries, their races form the majority of the world. Numerous projections have affirmed that in a few short decades, whites could become minorities in our own countries. A recent study out of Canada forecasted that in less than two decades, 7 out of 10 residents of Vancouver will be visible minorities. Despite this drastic decline of white populations around the world, only white Western countries are being subjected to mass immigration. That’s because the globalist “diversity” agenda is precisely designed to make the West less white.

Leftists, in their utopian quest to empower the “underdog,” oddly do not extend any hand of support to the minority white populations in South Africa and Zimbabwe who have been ruthlessly discriminated against for decades. The black President of South Africa Jacob Zuma recently called for the expropriation of white-owned land without compensation. He wants to kick whites off land they’ve lived on for centuries and hand it to random blacks. Imagine if a European leader proposed something like that? They’d be endlessly assailed as the “reincarnation of Hitler.”

Loony leftists side with blacks even when those blacks are the majority because they claim whites once had the upper-hand during colonialism. So in order to right that wrong, it’s okay to commit another wrong: discrimination against whites. The crazy logic of the left has always been that whites cannot ever be victims in any sense, especially not victims of discrimination and state-sanctioned racism as we’re seeing in South Africa today. Therefore, the very impetus driving leftist politics today is a genocidal animus against whites. They want to tear down “white privilege” wherever they claim it exists. And in places where it discernibly doesn’t exist, they will invent it as a boogeyman to keep themselves relevant.

The leftist-minority coalition is growing more brazen in their attacks against whites. And it doesn’t look like they’ll stop any time soon the way things are going.